Available worldwide via Amazon (Kindle Edition)
US: $5.99
Other regions: Local Amazon pricing
Available here:
https://www.amazon.nl/dp/B0GMXLX56T
Europe has the savings and the industrial ambition. What it still lacks is the architecture connecting banks, public institutions and institutional capital to investable projects across technology, energy, agrifood, health and advanced manufacturing.
Who is shaping Europe’s future? This series examines the people whose ideas, decisions and institutional power are redefining the continent’s political, financial and technological architecture—and the tensions their visions create as ambition meets the limits of execution.
Leiden University demonstrates that the future of Europe depends not only on applying knowledge, but on continually creating it. As artificial intelligence transforms access to information, the production of reliable new knowledge may become one of Europe’s most strategic capabilities.
Artificial intelligence is not merely a race between chatbots. It is a competition to build the mathematical foundations upon which future societies will increasingly depend. Mistral AI illustrates why algorithms are becoming strategic infrastructure—and why Europe’s AI future begins long before the interface.
Artificial intelligence did not emerge in isolation. It builds upon thousands of years of human curiosity, mathematics and engineering. Europe’s AI future will depend not only on algorithms, but on the knowledge, infrastructure and institutions that make intelligence possible.
Europe’s energy transition is often discussed as though every country is following the same path. In reality, Europe is building its future through a remarkably diverse landscape of nuclear power, hydropower, offshore wind, solar energy and interconnected electricity networks. Understanding that diversity is essential to understanding Europe’s emerging electro-powered continent.
Following the restoration of independence in 1991, Estonia chose to rebuild its institutions around digital infrastructure rather than bureaucracy. Today, the country demonstrates how trust, cybersecurity and digital governance have become strategic assets for both economic competitiveness and national resilience.
Europe has no shortage of innovation. The greater question is who ultimately owns the companies that transform scientific breakthroughs into industrial power. Ownership is no longer simply a financial issue. It increasingly determines where decisions are made, where ecosystems grow and where Europe’s future competitiveness takes shape.
Europe has never lacked innovation. Its challenge has been transforming research excellence into global companies that remain rooted in Europe. The scale-up gap raises a deeper question: can Europe build the capital architecture needed to turn innovation into ownership, influence and long-term sovereignty?
Europe wants digital sovereignty, yet often measures technological progress through frameworks designed elsewhere. If infrastructure is strategic, perhaps the institutions that define markets, benchmarks and technological leadership deserve the same level of scrutiny.
