Available worldwide via Amazon (Kindle Edition)
US: $5.99
Other regions: Local Amazon pricing
Available here:
https://www.amazon.nl/dp/B0GMXLX56T
Europe’s future may depend less on scale and more on capabilities that the rest of the world cannot easily replicate. Through the lens of ASML, this concluding essay explores how technological sovereignty, ecosystem resilience and strategic indispensability may shape Europe’s economic future.
Europe leads the debate on artificial intelligence, digital sovereignty and technology regulation. Yet beneath these ambitions lies a more fundamental question: does Europe possess the infrastructure required to support large-scale AI? From energy certainty to resource allocation, geography and adaptability, five forces may ultimately determine Europe’s ability to compete in the age of artificial intelligence.
ASML does not manufacture chips. It manufactures the machines required to produce them. As artificial intelligence and semiconductor demand continue to grow, the company increasingly resembles something more than a technology supplier: a form of strategic infrastructure.
For decades, ASML was viewed primarily as a technology company. Today, it increasingly occupies a position that extends beyond markets and products. In this series, Altair Media explores how ASML became one of the world’s most strategically important enterprises—and what that may mean for the future of Europe and the global technology economy.
What if Elon Musk decided to buy ASML? The question may sound implausible, but it reveals a deeper reality. As technology becomes increasingly strategic, some companies may have evolved beyond ordinary market logic and into critical infrastructure.
Cloud computing was once presented as borderless and abstract. In the age of AI, that illusion is fading. Energy grids, legal jurisdiction and physical compute infrastructure are reshaping how Europe thinks about cloud, sovereignty and the future architecture of digital power.
As AI-driven data centres scale at unprecedented speed, France’s centralised nuclear system faces a new kind of pressure. Built for stability, not acceleration, the grid must now absorb volatile demand while digital sovereignty increasingly depends on physical energy control.
For decades, European banking has been built around a visible moment of decision. A credit was approved. A risk was accepted. An exception was granted. There was a point in time — and a person — at which responsibility could be located. Today, that moment is becoming harder to identify.
For decades, Europe built its digital world from the ground up. Fibre followed roads. Mobile masts followed population density. Connectivity was something engineers could point at — tangible, terrestrial and geographically bounded. When networks failed, the causes were usually visible: a storm, a cut cable, a damaged site. That mental model is no longer sufficient.
