Available worldwide via Amazon (Kindle Edition)
US: $5.99
Other regions: Local Amazon pricing
Available here:
https://www.amazon.nl/dp/B0GMXLX56T
Leiden University demonstrates that the future of Europe depends not only on applying knowledge, but on continually creating it. As artificial intelligence transforms access to information, the production of reliable new knowledge may become one of Europe’s most strategic capabilities.
Can smaller universities become strategic assets? The University of Twente demonstrates that innovation is not defined by scale alone, but by the ability to integrate technology, entrepreneurship and society into a distinctive model of European excellence.
Innovation depends on more than scientific excellence. It depends on how effectively knowledge circulates between universities, industry and society. TU Eindhoven demonstrates how regional ecosystems can transform education into Europe’s long-term technological capacity.
Europe’s technological ambitions depend on far more than research funding and industrial investment. They depend on universities capable of educating the engineers, scientists and innovators who will design, build and sustain the continent’s future infrastructure.
Artificial intelligence is transforming access to information, but not the purpose of higher education. As knowledge becomes increasingly abundant, universities may find that their greatest responsibility is no longer teaching information, but cultivating judgement.
Why do some careers capture the imagination while others remain largely invisible? This Perspective explores how identity, cultural narratives and societal expectations shape educational choices—and why those choices increasingly influence the Netherlands’ future capacity to innovate.
Universities were built upon openness, collaboration and scientific exchange. Yet as semiconductors, photonics and artificial intelligence become strategic technologies, Europe increasingly faces a difficult question: how open can science remain when knowledge itself becomes infrastructure?
Universities are accelerating their adoption of artificial intelligence. But in that speed, something essential risks being lost. This essay argues for a deliberate pause—not as resistance, but as a condition to preserve depth, judgment and the role of friction in learning.
As artificial intelligence generates answers instantly, education must shift from knowledge to judgment. This essay explores how universities should redesign curricula to focus on problem definition, critical thinking and responsibility in an age where knowing is no longer enough.
Artificial intelligence is breaking the link between effort, output and understanding. As essays and exams become less reliable signals, universities must rethink assessment—not as a measure of performance, but as a way to reveal how students actually think.
