Available worldwide via Amazon (Kindle Edition)
US: $5.99
Other regions: Local Amazon pricing
Available here:
https://www.amazon.nl/dp/B0GMXLX56T
Artificial intelligence debates in Europe often revolve around regulation, sovereignty and the dominance of American platforms. Less visible, but no less consequential, is the role played by non-European industrial powers whose technologies are deeply embedded in Europe’s digital and economic fabric. Samsung is one of them.
When the European Union began drafting the AI Act, Spain was already ahead of the curve. Today, it is not an exaggeration to say that Spain is one of the founding architects of Europe’s AI regulation. While other countries are still debating the balance between innovation and safety, Spain has taken concrete steps: establishing a national AI agency, investing in world-class infrastructure and even building AI systems that reflect its own languages and culture. In a continent searching for technological sovereignty, Spain is quietly becoming a model for how to do it right.
Salesforce’s introduction of Agentforce 360 marks a new phase in the evolution of artificial intelligence inside organisations. Rather than positioning AI as a standalone automation layer, the concept of the “Agentic Enterprise” frames AI agents as collaborators: systems designed to support employees in decision-making, coordination and execution. While this approach is technologically ambitious, its European rollout reveals challenges that go far beyond software adoption.
For decades, ICT distributors played a largely technical and operational role in Europe’s digital economy. They moved hardware and software efficiently through the market, provided credit and logistics and remained mostly invisible to end users. Their importance was measured in scale and reliability, not strategy. That role is now fundamentally changing.
Central Europe is quietly awakening to artificial intelligence. Hungary, Slovakia and Czechia each have national strategies, growing startup ecosystems and university research programs, yet face structural and financial challenges. By 2030, three broad scenarios could emerge, shaping not only their domestic AI landscapes but also their role in Europe.
Poland is not always the first country mentioned when discussing Europe’s AI landscape. Yet beneath the surface, the country is building momentum with surprising speed. What started as scattered research initiatives has grown into a coordinated national strategy — supported by government funding, major infrastructure projects, expanding academic programs and a growing private-sector footprint.
When most people think of Greece, images of the Acropolis, sun-drenched islands and ancient philosophers come to mind. But in labs tucked away across Athens and other cities, a different kind of innovation is quietly taking shape — artificial intelligence. Greek universities are carving out a space for the country in Europe’s fast-evolving AI ecosystem, blending tradition with cutting-edge technology.
When it comes to artificial intelligence, it’s as if Europe, the United States and China are playing entirely different games. Europe writes the rules. The US builds the race-cars — fast, aggressive and often messy. China tries to build an entire ecosystem, from roads to regulations to surveillance. In this global match, what counts is not only how you play, but how and why.
When Thierry Breton stepped down as European Commissioner in 2024, he left behind a legacy of ambition and vision for Europe’s technological future. Breton had pushed for digital sovereignty, stronger industrial and AI policies and a robust regulatory framework. Yet, the landscape he helped shape has evolved into something far more complex than any single individual could steer.
Artificial intelligence is moving fast, sometimes faster than anyone can keep up with. Every few months a new breakthrough appears, promising more reasoning power, more creativity, more accuracy. Google’s release of Gemini 3 marks one of those moments where the landscape shifts again. Not because it replaces everything that came before, but because it shows how AI is evolving from a simple assistant into something much closer to a thinking partner.
