Available worldwide via Amazon (Kindle Edition)
US: $5.99
Other regions: Local Amazon pricing
Available here:
https://www.amazon.nl/dp/B0GMXLX56T
Europe needs Ericsson to preserve technological agency, but Ericsson needs global markets to remain relevant. The company’s strategic value lies not in technological isolation, but in keeping Europe influential inside the standards and architectures shaping worldwide communication.
Europe made payments instant, but fraud intelligence still moves between banks, platforms and authorities at institutional speed. As AI industrialises deception, Europe must decide who connects—and ultimately controls—the warning systems protecting its financial architecture.
A mobile standard is not merely a neutral technical agreement. It is where research, institutional consensus and patented inventions become shared infrastructure. Ericsson’s influence lies deep inside this process, helping shape the grammar of global communication.
Europe’s largest universal banks already possess the balance sheets, sector knowledge and capital-market access needed to support industrial renewal. What Europe lacks is a shared architecture that can turn their separate capabilities into a coordinated investment system.
When a platform can monitor performance, judge behaviour and withdraw access to income, it no longer acts merely as an intermediary. The Uber case reveals how employer-like power can emerge without a visible employer or accountable human decision-maker.
Helsing shows that Europe can build defence technology to global scale. The harder question is what happens next: whether Europe can develop the capital, industrial partnerships and market architecture needed to make companies like Helsing less exceptional.
Technological innovation alone does not create resilient societies. Erasmus University Rotterdam explores how governance, economics, healthcare and public institutions together provide the institutional capacity that enables modern societies to function.
Europe’s AI Gigafactories are about far more than computing power. They represent a new generation of strategic infrastructure where energy, semiconductors, photonics, connectivity and industrial ecosystems determine whether Europe’s AI ambitions can become reality.
Meta is investing hundreds of billions in AI infrastructure. China is making artificial intelligence increasingly affordable. As these two strategies collide, Europe may face its greatest technological challenge yet: can digital sovereignty survive the economics of everyday choice?
When seven European technology leaders issued a joint call for action, much of the discussion focused on regulation. Yet the significance of the coalition may lie elsewhere. By bringing together companies from semiconductors, telecommunications, industrial systems, software, artificial intelligence and aerospace, the statement reveals a broader shift in European thinking: from individual sectors toward interconnected technology ecosystems.
