Available worldwide via Amazon (Kindle Edition)
US: $5.99
Other regions: Local Amazon pricing
Available here:
https://www.amazon.nl/dp/B0GMXLX56T
When networks become intelligent, they stop being neutral. Decisions once made by institutions move quietly into protocols, standards and optimisation logic. In the era of 6G, the design of infrastructure becomes the invisible constitution of digital society.
For decades, digital networks have functioned as reactive infrastructures. They transmitted signals, responded to requests and waited for human input. Agency was clear: users acted, systems followed. Efficiency was measured in speed, bandwidth and latency.
For decades, France was the envy of industrial Europe. While its neighbours wrestled with carbon targets, volatile gas markets and energy imports, Paris relied on a vast, state-led nuclear system that delivered cheap, stable and largely carbon-free electricity. France appeared to have solved the energy puzzle long before the rest of the continent even agreed on the rules.
As AI-driven data centres scale at unprecedented speed, France’s centralised nuclear system faces a new kind of pressure. Built for stability, not acceleration, the grid must now absorb volatile demand while digital sovereignty increasingly depends on physical energy control.
France built its power on nuclear electricity. Today, that system is under strain. As AI, data centres and digital sovereignty reshape demand, France’s centralised energy model faces a defining stress test for Europe’s digital future.
For decades, telecommunications lived comfortably behind a powerful assumption: neutrality. Operators built the pipes. Society decided what flowed through them. Connectivity was infrastructure — invisible, technical, politically silent. This separation created reassurance. If networks were neutral, responsibility lay elsewhere: with governments, platforms or users. Telecom, in this view, merely enabled.
Under Allison Kirkby, British Telecom is no longer the BT it once was. What began as a domestic restructuring has evolved into something far more consequential: a redefinition of how connectivity itself is organised, governed and valued. Nowhere is this shift more visible than within BT Worldwide.
Most discussions about artificial intelligence begin with innovation. This one should begin with power. SAP is not a visible technology giant in the public imagination. It does not shape culture, consumer behaviour or daily communication. Yet few companies exert more influence over the functioning of the global economy. An estimated 87 percent of worldwide trade touches SAP systems somewhere along its journey. Orders, invoices, customs declarations, supply chains and public-sector processes move through SAP’s logic layers every second of the day.
Europe has always expressed its values through infrastructure. Roman roads were not merely paths of stone; they were instruments of order and reach. Railways shaped the industrial nation-state. Broadcasting networks created mass culture and democratic publics. Infrastructure, in other words, has never been neutral. It is where political intent quietly hardens into daily reality.
While the U.S. telecom market is dominated by scale-driven giants such as AT&T and Verizon—racing toward AI-native networks—the Netherlands tells a different, distinctly European story. Here, the transformation of telecom is less about sheer size and more about fiber depth, reliability and human-centered design.
