Available worldwide via Amazon (Kindle Edition)
US: $5.99
Other regions: Local Amazon pricing
Available here:
https://www.amazon.nl/dp/B0GMXLX56T
As algorithms and artificial intelligence increasingly determine what citizens see, media literacy can no longer focus solely on identifying misinformation. Understanding the infrastructures that shape visibility has become essential for democratic resilience and cognitive autonomy in Europe’s evolving digital public sphere.
Artificial intelligence is usually discussed as software. Faster models. Bigger datasets. Smarter algorithms. But what if the real shift is not in the code — but in the physics?
For years, financial markets have presented themselves as transparent mechanisms. Prices move, analysts explain, quarterly results confirm or disappoint. Risk is assessed, information is absorbed and capital responds. At least, that is the theory.
We live in a time where technological innovation never pauses. Artificial Intelligence is growing exponentially; algorithms predict our behavior and smart systems make decisions once reserved for humans. Yet… life feels faster but poorer. We have more resources than ever, yet less time, less rest and less meaning. Society seems increasingly individualistic; hidden poverty is on the rise—not only financially but socially and emotionally.
Europe’s next digital backbone is not emerging from a single campus or corporate headquarters. It is taking shape through a distributed network of laboratories, researchers and industrial partners — and one of its most important nodes lies in Portugal. From Lisbon to Aveiro, the Instituto de Telecomunicações (IT) has become a quiet but decisive force in how Europe approaches artificial intelligence, next-generation networks and digital trust.
Telefónica is a century old. Once, it embodied Spanish modernity in its most tangible form: cables, exchanges, uniforms, physical presence. Today, it is something else — or is attempting to become something else entirely. Less visible. More abstract. More algorithmic. The central question is no longer how Telefónica grows, but what it is becoming.
Artificial intelligence is still debated at full volume—faster adoption, tighter rules, louder warnings. Meanwhile, its most consequential effects are unfolding elsewhere. Inside Europe’s universities, AI is no longer just a tool. It is a mirror. What it reflects is unsettling. Authorship weakens as evidence of thought. Efficiency detaches from understanding. Control, once foundational to academic authority, begins to hollow out.
Artificial intelligence is often framed as a contest between platforms, startups and sovereign states. Public debate tends to revolve around models, chips and regulation. Yet beneath this visible layer lies a quieter infrastructure of influence: organisations that do not build AI themselves, but play a decisive role in how it is deployed, governed and ultimately normalised.
Europe’s conversation about artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly mature. We debate regulation, ethics, sovereignty and competitiveness. We compare ecosystems, discuss talent shortages and measure ourselves against the United States and China.
When Warren Buffett speaks, markets listen. His annual letters are dissected line by line, his investment choices treated as signals of economic truth. Yet far from the spotlight, a far larger and arguably more consequential investor shapes global capitalism with almost no noise at all. Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global — often called the world’s largest sovereign wealth fund — does not try to beat the market. It is the market.
