Available worldwide via Amazon (Kindle Edition)
US: $5.99
Other regions: Local Amazon pricing
Available here:
https://www.amazon.nl/dp/B0GMXLX56T
Europe has the savings and the industrial ambition. What it still lacks is the architecture connecting banks, public institutions and institutional capital to investable projects across technology, energy, agrifood, health and advanced manufacturing.
Europe is beginning to build the funds its scale-ups need. But growth capital is only a bridge. Without sufficient liquidity, specialist investors and a credible European exit market, its most successful technology companies may still gravitate towards New York.
Jean-Christophe Laloux’s appointment may signal a new phase for the European Investment Fund: moving beyond filling individual financing gaps towards creating the structures, incentives and partnerships through which private capital becomes willing to carry European strategic risk.
The European Investment Fund rarely chooses individual winners. Its deeper role is to share risk, anchor investment vehicles and strengthen the transition from innovation to investability — helping private capital move where markets are not yet ready to move alone.
Helsing shows that Europe can build defence technology to global scale. The harder question is what happens next: whether Europe can develop the capital, industrial partnerships and market architecture needed to make companies like Helsing less exceptional.
Europe says it needs hundreds of billions to finance its future. Yet Norway’s sovereign wealth fund alone manages more than €2 trillion. The real constraint may not be capital, but Europe’s architecture for turning savings into scale.
Despite sharing a common currency, Europe’s capital markets remain fragmented across national legal and financial systems. This essay explores why the Capital Markets Union seeks to bridge those divisions—and why deeper financial integration has become essential for Europe’s future competitiveness.
Europe has built a single market and a common currency, yet its capital remains fragmented. This opening essay explores why the Capital Markets Union has become a strategic priority—and why financial markets are increasingly part of Europe’s critical infrastructure.
Europe has a common currency, yet its capital markets remain fragmented. This series explores the stock exchanges, financial infrastructure and institutions shaping investment, innovation and long-term ownership—and why a stronger Capital Markets Union has become central to Europe’s economic future.
As payments become increasingly digital, Europe faces a fundamental question. How can citizens continue to access public money in an economy increasingly shaped by private platforms? The Digital Euro is ultimately less about technology than about preserving institutional trust.
