Available worldwide via Amazon (Kindle Edition)
US: $5.99
Other regions: Local Amazon pricing
Available here:
https://www.amazon.nl/dp/B0GMXLX56T
In an era defined by accelerating technologies, regulatory uncertainty and geopolitical fragmentation, organizations are increasingly surrounded by information — yet often lack orientation. Strategy decks multiply, consultants offer roadmaps and compliance frameworks expand. What is frequently missing is something more fundamental: an independent moment of reflection from outside the system.
Artificial intelligence is often framed as a contest between platforms, startups and sovereign states. Public debate tends to revolve around models, chips and regulation. Yet beneath this visible layer lies a quieter infrastructure of influence: organisations that do not build AI themselves, but play a decisive role in how it is deployed, governed and ultimately normalised.
There is a quiet shift happening in how technology is understood. For years, innovation was explained by engineers, promoted by corporations and regulated by policymakers. Each spoke their own language. Each believed their version was sufficient. And for a long time, it worked — or seemed to.
The Middle East is no longer just an oil region. Today, it is a laboratory for ambition, investment and strategic recalibration. Countries like Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain are racing to define their place in a world reshaped by artificial intelligence, technological innovation and the subtle currents of geopolitics.
Semiconductors have become the fault line of modern geopolitics. The United States and China are investing aggressively in domestic chip production, treating semiconductors not as consumer goods but as strategic infrastructure. Europe, by contrast, spent decades optimising research while outsourcing large-scale manufacturing — until recent crises exposed how fragile that model had become.
For decades, Silicon Valley defined the global technology narrative. Startups, venture capital and rapid software innovation drew the world’s attention. Today, a quieter but far more consequential shift is underway. A new configuration is emerging — a triangle connecting the Netherlands, Dallas–Fort Worth in Texas and Bengaluru in India — that is quietly defining the future of deep technology.
When Warren Buffett speaks, markets listen. His annual letters are dissected line by line, his investment choices treated as signals of economic truth. Yet far from the spotlight, a far larger and arguably more consequential investor shapes global capitalism with almost no noise at all. Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global — often called the world’s largest sovereign wealth fund — does not try to beat the market. It is the market.
Artificial intelligence debates in Europe often revolve around regulation, sovereignty and the dominance of American platforms. Less visible, but no less consequential, is the role played by non-European industrial powers whose technologies are deeply embedded in Europe’s digital and economic fabric. Samsung is one of them.
Quantum computing is often presented as a technological race: who has the most qubits, the lowest error rates or the boldest scientific claims. That framing is misleading. The real story unfolding in 2025 is not about hardware benchmarks, but about how societies choose to organize technological power.
As much of today’s technology and economic news is framed through an American lens, Europe often appears hesitant, fragmented or slow. The loudest narratives come from across the Atlantic, while China remains largely silent. In that contrast, Europe tends to underestimate its own strengths — institutionally, economically and technologically.
