Available worldwide via Amazon (Kindle Edition)
US: $5.99
Other regions: Local Amazon pricing
Available here:
https://www.amazon.nl/dp/B0GMXLX56T
The transformation of telecom networks is often described in technical language — cloud-native cores, autonomous operations, AI-driven optimization. Yet beneath the architecture diagrams and vendor roadmaps lies a deeper challenge, one that cannot be solved by software alone.
Vodafone is at a pivotal juncture. The question is no longer whether to integrate AI, but whether to overlay it on existing legacy networks or to embrace a radical, AI-native architecture. The choices made today will define the operator’s role in the rapidly evolving global telecom landscape.
Ask ten European executives what the AI Act means for their organisation and you will likely receive ten different answers. Some see it as a legal framework best handled by compliance teams. Others assume it mainly targets Big Tech. A few quietly believe that enforcement will take years — long enough for technology to move on again.
Under Allison Kirkby, British Telecom is no longer the BT it once was. What began as a domestic restructuring has evolved into something far more consequential: a redefinition of how connectivity itself is organised, governed and valued. Nowhere is this shift more visible than within BT Worldwide.
For generations, financial markets were understood as expressions of human judgement. Prices moved because investors expected growth or feared decline. Volatility reflected uncertainty. Even panic had a psychology. Markets were imperfect, emotional and sometimes irrational — but they were intelligible. Movement implied intention. Today, that connection is weakening.
BT under Allison Kirkby is no longer behaving like a traditional European telecom operator. It is no longer optimizing a legacy structure, nor defending historical assets. Instead, it is redefining what a telecom company is allowed to be in the AI era.
For decades, European banking has been built around a visible moment of decision. A credit was approved. A risk was accepted. An exception was granted. There was a point in time — and a person — at which responsibility could be located. Today, that moment is becoming harder to identify.
Allison Kirkby is not cutting costs. She is reshaping BT, stripping it to its essence. While global data consumption is at an all-time high, BT is reducing its workforce by 40%. This is not a conventional restructuring; it is the deliberate birth of a software-defined telecom, where AI is not just a tool, but the new engineer.
Most discussions about artificial intelligence begin with innovation. This one should begin with power. SAP is not a visible technology giant in the public imagination. It does not shape culture, consumer behaviour or daily communication. Yet few companies exert more influence over the functioning of the global economy. An estimated 87 percent of worldwide trade touches SAP systems somewhere along its journey. Orders, invoices, customs declarations, supply chains and public-sector processes move through SAP’s logic layers every second of the day.
For decades, Europe built its digital world from the ground up. Fibre followed roads. Mobile masts followed population density. Connectivity was something engineers could point at — tangible, terrestrial and geographically bounded. When networks failed, the causes were usually visible: a storm, a cut cable, a damaged site. That mental model is no longer sufficient.
