Available worldwide via Amazon (Kindle Edition)
US: $5.99
Other regions: Local Amazon pricing
Available here:
https://www.amazon.nl/dp/B0GMXLX56T
In many organisations, digital progress has slowed not because of technology, but because the core has become cluttered and opaque. Clean Core is not an IT project — it is institutional maintenance, restoring clarity and authority so organisations can act with confidence.
Innovation is easy to promise. Delivering it while millions of businesses, governments and public institutions rely on your systems is another story. SAP’s challenge is not creating flashy solutions that attract attention, but ensuring that those solutions actually keep the world running, every day.
For years, automation has been presented as a promise of control. Processes would become predictable. Risks measurable. Decisions traceable and compliant. When artificial intelligence entered the enterprise, that promise was reinforced with a familiar reassurance: there will always be a human in the loop.
Europe may be SAP’s home, but it is no longer the place where its future will be decided. That future is shaped elsewhere — in the boardrooms of American multinationals, in the industrial corridors of Asia and in innovation hubs stretching from Silicon Valley to Bangalore. For a company born in Walldorf, Germany, global presence is no longer a strategic option. It is an existential condition.
Technology is moving faster than human comprehension. AI, autonomous networks and 5G/6G infrastructures are reshaping industries. CEOs are caught in the middle: accountable for decisions they cannot fully understand. Shareholders demand results. Regulators demand compliance. Society demands responsibility.
Europe speaks confidently about its digital future. About strategic autonomy, technological sovereignty and the ambition to reduce dependency on foreign platforms. In policy papers the language is convincing. In conferences it sounds even stronger.
Ask ten European executives what the AI Act means for their organisation and you will likely receive ten different answers. Some see it as a legal framework best handled by compliance teams. Others assume it mainly targets Big Tech. A few quietly believe that enforcement will take years — long enough for technology to move on again.
Most discussions about artificial intelligence begin with innovation. This one should begin with power. SAP is not a visible technology giant in the public imagination. It does not shape culture, consumer behaviour or daily communication. Yet few companies exert more influence over the functioning of the global economy. An estimated 87 percent of worldwide trade touches SAP systems somewhere along its journey. Orders, invoices, customs declarations, supply chains and public-sector processes move through SAP’s logic layers every second of the day.
For more than a year, Europe has been debating competitiveness, investment and strategic autonomy. At the centre of that debate stands Mario Draghi — not as a politician, but as a system thinker with rare institutional authority.
For many, the European AI Act is a dense legal document — a framework of obligations, risk categories and compliance mechanisms designed to bring order to a rapidly evolving technological field. But this reading misses a deeper and more consequential layer. What if the AI Act is not merely a regulatory instrument, but a cultural statement?
