Available worldwide via Amazon (Kindle Edition)
US: $5.99
Other regions: Local Amazon pricing
Available here:
https://www.amazon.nl/dp/B0GMXLX56T
EQT has identified more than 1,000 potential targets for the Scaleup Europe Fund. The deeper question is what happens next: whether Europe’s exchanges, institutional investors and regulators are ready when today’s scale-ups become tomorrow’s multibillion-euro public companies.
Europe wants deeper capital markets, but its banking layer remains indispensable. The EBA’s role is to keep that layer coherent across the Single Market — strong enough to absorb shocks, flexible enough to support growth, and connected enough to work with capital markets.
Europe’s capital markets do not operate independently. Beneath every share, bond and investment fund lies a monetary system that prices risk, provides liquidity and settles transactions. The ECB guards the stability on which this emerging market architecture rests.
Feedzai is not the next Scaleup Europe prediction. It is a test case for a harder question: whether Europe can remain financially relevant when its most promising technology companies become large, global and strategically important.
Europe’s public bank is becoming more than a lender. As strategic risks grow, the EIB increasingly helps determine which infrastructure, technologies and industrial capacities can become financeable — turning public financial capacity into part of Europe’s industrial architecture.
The European Investment Fund rarely chooses individual winners. Its deeper role is to share risk, anchor investment vehicles and strengthen the transition from innovation to investability — helping private capital move where markets are not yet ready to move alone.
As Europe’s capital markets become more connected, supervision remains largely national. ESMA is emerging as the institution best placed to guard that interface — protecting market integrity without becoming the operator or owner of the system.
Helsing shows that Europe can build defence technology to global scale. The harder question is what happens next: whether Europe can develop the capital, industrial partnerships and market architecture needed to make companies like Helsing less exceptional.
Europe may already possess much of the financial infrastructure it needs. The deeper challenge is connecting markets, capital and institutions into a more continuous system — and determining who should guard the interface between them.
After ICEYE and Lovable, the next possible moves around Europe’s Scaleup Europe Fund point to something larger than a sequence of investments. They suggest an emerging capital architecture aimed not only at scale, but at strategically important technological capabilities.
