Available worldwide via Amazon (Kindle Edition)
US: $5.99
Other regions: Local Amazon pricing
Available here:
https://www.amazon.nl/dp/B0GMXLX56T
Christine Lagarde has broadened the language of central banking beyond inflation and interest rates. Her vision reveals Europe’s deeper dilemma: a common currency cannot create economic scale, monetary sovereignty or integrated capital markets without corresponding political architecture.
A mobile standard is not merely a neutral technical agreement. It is where research, institutional consensus and patented inventions become shared infrastructure. Ericsson’s influence lies deep inside this process, helping shape the grammar of global communication.
Under Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission has moved beyond regulation towards crisis management, industrial strategy and geopolitical coordination. Her vision is of a Europe capable of acting—but its growing executive ambition raises questions about power and accountability.
Europe’s regional banks possess the relationships and sector knowledge to identify industrial investment close to the real economy. The challenge is turning that local intelligence into standardised, investable assets capable of reaching European scale across borders.
Europe’s largest universal banks already possess the balance sheets, sector knowledge and capital-market access needed to support industrial renewal. What Europe lacks is a shared architecture that can turn their separate capabilities into a coordinated investment system.
Morgan Stanley’s $1.5 trillion initiative turns strategic technology into investable infrastructure, confronting European pension funds and insurers with a growing dilemma: will Europe’s accumulated wealth build its own productive capacity—or finance the technological power on which it depends?
Europe is beginning to build the funds its scale-ups need. But growth capital is only a bridge. Without sufficient liquidity, specialist investors and a credible European exit market, its most successful technology companies may still gravitate towards New York.
Jean-Christophe Laloux’s appointment may signal a new phase for the European Investment Fund: moving beyond filling individual financing gaps towards creating the structures, incentives and partnerships through which private capital becomes willing to carry European strategic risk.
When a platform can monitor performance, judge behaviour and withdraw access to income, it no longer acts merely as an intermediary. The Uber case reveals how employer-like power can emerge without a visible employer or accountable human decision-maker.
Europe’s financial architecture does not end with its European institutions. National supervisors and central banks remain essential because integration depends not on eliminating local authority, but on connecting it coherently with the European level.
