Available worldwide via Amazon (Kindle Edition)
US: $5.99
Other regions: Local Amazon pricing
Available here:
https://www.amazon.nl/dp/B0GMXLX56T
For much of the past half-century, innovation followed a recognisable pattern. New technologies emerged at the margins, matured through research and industry, and were eventually absorbed into stable infrastructures. Strategy assumed continuity. Institutions assumed predictability. Progress, however fast, remained legible.
Europe speaks increasingly loudly about digital sovereignty. In policy papers, keynote speeches and regulatory frameworks, the ambition is clear: to regain strategic autonomy in a world shaped by American and Asian technology platforms. Yet behind this language lies a structural contradiction. Europe possesses rules, but lacks executional authority over its own digital infrastructure.
Artificial intelligence is usually discussed as software. Faster models. Bigger datasets. Smarter algorithms. But what if the real shift is not in the code — but in the physics?
This article is prompted by a concrete intervention. In early 2026, Orange EU Policy submitted a formal contribution to the European Commission’s call for evidence on Open Digital Ecosystems. On the surface, it reads like a policy position on open-source software. Read more carefully and it reveals something else: a large European telecom incumbent signalling that the old proprietary model no longer offers strategic shelter.
Modern data centers present themselves as the pinnacle of technological progress: dense racks, immense processing power and ever-growing capacity. Yet beneath this appearance of novelty lies a quieter truth. Most data centers today are not truly designed; they are inherited. Their structure reflects decades-old assumptions about how computation should be organised, scaled and cooled.
In Eindhoven, Professor Martijn Heck explains how photonic chips — using light instead of electricity — may shape the next phase of computing. Beyond technology, the conversation reveals Europe’s fragile position between American power and China’s quiet scale.
Europe currently occupies the center of global attention. War at its eastern border. Trade tensions reshaping supply chains. The fragile triangle between the United States, China and Europe itself. These are not marginal issues; they are structural shifts that will define the coming decades.
Europe speaks confidently about its digital future. About strategic autonomy, technological sovereignty and the ambition to reduce dependency on foreign platforms. In policy papers the language is convincing. In conferences it sounds even stronger.
Allison Kirkby is not cutting costs. She is reshaping BT, stripping it to its essence. While global data consumption is at an all-time high, BT is reducing its workforce by 40%. This is not a conventional restructuring; it is the deliberate birth of a software-defined telecom, where AI is not just a tool, but the new engineer.
For more than a year, Europe has been debating competitiveness, investment and strategic autonomy. At the centre of that debate stands Mario Draghi — not as a politician, but as a system thinker with rare institutional authority.
